SLQS Qatar

Welcome to Sri Lankan Quantity Surveyors Qatar

Online Dispute Resolution: A Contemporary and Effective Approach to Construction Disputes in the UK and Qatar

Fawzan Rafeek
PhD (R) Law, M. Sc(Law), BSc(QS), MRICS, MCIArb, A.I.Q.S.SL, MAIQS

Abstract

Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) has rapidly emerged as a practical, efficient, and forward-looking form of ADR
within the construction industry in the UK. Construction disputes are often complex, high-value, and time-sensitive.
Conventional dispute resolution mechanisms, including litigation, arbitration, and even traditional mediation,
frequently fail to meet the needs of modern industry for speed, cost efficiency, and flexibility.
This article describes the evolution of ODR in the UK construction industry in plain and intelligible terms. It identifies
why ODR is increasingly considered the most apt ADR mechanism for contemporary construction disputes and
assesses its possible implementation in Qatar, where the construction industry is thriving at a pace never experienced
before. The legal, cultural, and technological aspects have been discussed, and pragmatic suggestions are mooted to
assist the orderly and efficient implementation of ODR in Qatar.
This article, in simple and professional language, is for practitioners, students, and the general community of SLQS
Qatar. This paper is also provided as a knowledge-sharing contribution to the 21st SLQS Qatar Get-Together.

 
Introduction

Construction disputes are an inherent feature of construction projects regardless of scale, complexity, or geographical
location. The most common causes of disputes relate to delays and variations, payment claims, design changes,
ambiguities in contract terms, and different understandings of contractual requirements. Often, there are multiple
parties involved in such disputes: usually the employer, contractor, and/or subcontractor; sometimes consultants
and suppliers, too. Because many construction projects involve vast sums of money, unresolved disputes pose serious
risks for project delivery, cash flow, and professional relationships.
Traditionally, construction disputes arising in the UK have been settled through the courts or well-established ADR
platforms like arbitration, mediation, and statutory adjudication. Although these methods have indeed produced
worthy results, each method has its limitations. Court procedures are always lengthy and expensive, making the whole
process confrontational. Arbitration, despite its confidential nature, is costly and may be procedurally complicated.
Even mediation and adjudication require physical presence, extensive documentation, and huge investments of time.
It is against this background that rapid technological advancement, accompanied by the shift of most activities
towards digital solutions globally, brought about ODR. ODR employs secure digital platforms and communication
tools in conducting dispute resolution processes without any physical presence. The COVID-19 pandemic has further
proved the effectiveness of online processes and has accelerated the acceptance of ODR in the legal and construction
fields.
This paper will argue that ODR is currently the most suitable ADR scheme for contemporary construction disputes
within the UK. In addition, it will examine whether or not it is feasible to apply this model to Qatar, where construction
plays such an integral role in country development. This matter directly concerns Quantity Surveyors as it is common
for their professional practice to be placed directly within contract administration and disputes.

 
The Evolution of ADR in the UK Construction Industry

Historical Development
The construction sector in the UK is known for a large number of disputes, which are a result of complicated contractual
conditions, tight timelines, and high financial risk. Before the 1990s, disputes in the industry were mostly settledthrough litigation, which caused a delay in projects and a lot of legal expense. The method was widely disapproved in
relation to cash flow and working relationships in the sector.
The big change came with the passage of the Housing Grants, Construction, and Regeneration Act 1996, also known
as the Construction Act of 1996. The Construction Act 1996 brought in the compulsory adjudication procedure as a
formal right for all parties in a construction contract. The adjudication process allowed a dispute in a construction
contract to be resolved temporarily in a matter of a few weeks, usually 28 days, while not affecting the formal right
of either party.
The Construction Act made a major difference in dispute resolution in the UK construction industry. It lessened
reliance on litigation and ensured that ADR is now an integral part of construction contracts. However, over the years,
mediation and arbitration eventually
gained wider acceptance as courts and industry bodies actively promoted alternative methods of dispute resolution.

Judicial Support and Case Law
UK courts have consistently displayed firm support for ADR. Where available, parties are encouraged to use ADR, and
failure to do so for unreasonable reasons may lead to cost sanctions. The decisions of the courts also highlighted the
importance of certainty and clarity in the ADR provisions contained within construction contracts.
The court reiterated in Kajima Construction (Europe) UK Ltd v Children’s Ark Partnership Ltd that while ADR is
encouraged, contractual mechanisms have to be drafted with sufficient precision if they are to be enforceable. This
approach has fostered confidence in ADR processes and strengthened the legal environment within which ODR has
emerged.

Legislative and Procedural Framework
Taken together, the Construction Act 1996, the Scheme for Construction Contracts, and the Civil Procedure Rules
give a comprehensive framework of ADR in the UK. The CPR positively encourages settlement and acknowledges the
use of electronic documents and remote procedures. This procedural flexibility has given favorable conditions to
develop and accept ODR within the construction sector.

 

The Emergence of ODR

Understanding – ODR
The ODR refers to the utilisation of technology and online / digital platforms for the conduct of dispute resolution
procedures such as negotiation, mediation, adjudication, and arbitration. ODR does not affect the principles of
Alternative Dispute Resolution, but instead, it only brings about innovation in its delivery.
Common in ODR platforms are video conferencing capabilities, safe document exchange, online case management
platforms, electronic signatures, as well as encrypted communication platforms. Such platforms ensure that involved
parties can access and engage in dispute resolution initiatives from anywhere and at convenient times that fit their
schedule.

Drivers of ODR Adoption in the UK

There are several reasons that have led to the increased acceptance of ODR in the UK construction sector:
• More incorporation of digital technology in professional activities
• The rising costs associated with conventional dispute resolutions
• The global aspect of contemporary construction projects
• Lessons learned from the COVID-19 Pandemic
• Active support from the judiciary and institutions regarding digital processes

This has ensured that ODR enhances and matures from a mere emergency mechanism to a respectable means of
resolving disputes in the construction industry. 

Emerging Context for ODR in Qatar
While the adoption of ODR in Qatar remains at a developing stage, recent institutional and procedural developments
indicate a clear trajectory towards greater digitalisation. In particular, the increased use of electronic filing systems,
remote and hybrid hearings, and online case management tools, accelerated during and following the COVID-19
pandemic reflect an ongoing process of procedural modernisation within Qatar’s dispute resolution framework.
These developments demonstrate that Qatar is not disengaged from global trends in digital dispute resolution.
Rather, ODR is gradually emerging within an evolving institutional landscape, providing a foundation upon which
more formalised and sector-specific ODR mechanisms, including those applicable to construction disputes, may be
developed in the future.

Advantage of ODR in Construction Disputes

Cost Efficiency
Reducing costs is one of the most valuable benefits of ODR. Indeed, in traditional methods of resolving disputes, several
costs, such as travel costs, accommodation, venue charges, and the preparation of documents, often accompany the
professional fees of the dispute resolution professional.
In construction disputes, in which cash flow is essential, saving costs through ODR appears extremely appealing.
Smaller claims that may not merit arbitration or litigation can now be resolved through online methods.

Speed and Flexibility
Construction disputes often arise and must be resolved quickly in order to avoid disruption of the project at hand.
ODR makes it possible for hearings and meetings to be organized more quickly compared to physical attendance.
Asynchronous communication also adds to efficiency as it allows for engagement at convenient times.

Accessibility and Convenience
ODR helps eliminate geographical restrictions, enabling participants, subject matter experts, and representatives to
take part in ODR proceedings from remote locations. This can prove particularly useful in cross-border construction
projects and for professionals who may have commitments in numerous projects.

Confidentiality and Data Security
This is particularly true for dispute resolution in the construction industry, where confidentiality is important,
particularly if the dispute relates to commercial information. This is not a problem for modern ODR platforms, which
have strong security systems such as encryption.

Relationship Preservation
ODR, and mediation-based ODR in particular, encourages cooperation rather than confrontation. In this regard,
it assists in maintaining professional relations, an important factor in effective project implementation in the
construction sector.


Practical Experience of ODR in the UK


In the UK, for example, various dispute resolution providers and institutions have begun to adopt various forms of
ODR mechanisms for the resolution of construction disputes. Reports of practitioners and experience of providers,
for example, the Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR) and Electronic Dispute Solutions (EDS), indicate that,
in reality, disputes that may have taken months, if not years, to resolve may, in reality, be resolved within a matter of
days using online dispute resolution mechanisms.
Although the full scope of the experience of the effectiveness of ODR mechanisms may yet be gauged through the
emerging empirical data, the experience of the dispute resolution providers and schemes in the UK suggests that
ODR mechanisms may be an effective tool for the reduction of delay in the resolution of construction disputes where
the parties are willing to engage with the process electronically. Such experience suggests that ODR is no longer just a theoretical concept but may be an effective tool for the resolution of construction disputes.

 
Comparative Study: UK and Qatar

UK Context
The existing culture of ADR in the UK is fully developed and is embedded in legislation and case law. ODR fits easily
within this existing framework.

The Qatari Context
The construction industry in Qatar exhibits vibrant growth and foreign involvement. The dispute resolution practice,
nevertheless, remains dominated by litigations and arbitration. Though organizations like the Qatar International
Court and Dispute Resolution Centre operate on global best practices, ODR in Qatar remains at an early stage of
development.

 
ODR Opportunities in Qatar

ODR provides several benefits to Qatar, such as speedy justice delivery, cost savings, increased justice accessibility,
and the country’s Qatar National Vision 2030 goals that focus on innovation and digital transformation and the
adoption of innovative technologies.
Barriers to ODR Implementation in Qatar
Among the main challenges are the lack of clear legal recognition of ODR, the culture of preferring physical meeting
experiences, and the need to have secured and bespoke online platforms suited to the legal process.

Recommendations
• Establish legal systems to recognize ODR decisions
• Empower leadership in institutions via formations like QICDRC
• Design safe and user-friendly ODR platforms
• Training and awareness programs for professionals

 

The Role of Quantity Surveyors in ODR

Quantity Surveyors are of critical importance in the management of disputes, especially those relating to valuation,
variations, extension of time, and final accounts. This is mainly because of the involvement of the Quantity Surveyor
in the entire process of the project, which means that the role of the Quantity Surveyor is often critical in the
generation of disputes.
In an ODR context, Quantity Surveyors contribute significantly by providing well-organised electronic records,
structured cost data, and clearly substantiated claims capable of being efficiently reviewed through digital platforms.
Their expertise in contract administration, claim preparation, and cost analysis positions them to support early
neutral evaluation and informed decision-making within online mediation and adjudication processes. Effective
documentation and transparent cost reporting therefore play a key role in enhancing the efficiency, accuracy, and
credibility of ODR outcomes.

 

ODR and Dispute Avoidance

In addition, and apart from the process of alternative dispute resolution, ODR can also be utilized in a proactive
manner for the purpose of avoiding or preventing disputes. For example, initial engagement and neutral evaluation
can help in addressing issues before they can result in a formal dispute.

 

Capacity Building and Professional Development

Effective implementation of ODR demands investment in building professional skills. Technical knowledge needs to
be supplemented with internet and online communication skills. SLQS Qatar can be an important catalyst in the form
of training and knowledge-sharing activities by professional bodies.

 

Cultural Adaptation and Trust Building

Establishing a degree of trust in ODR is important if ODR is to be effectively introduced in Qatar. Phased implementation,
a combination of online and limited physical interaction, and positive user experience will all help to establish a
degree of confidence in ODR.

 
Future Outlook

The future is digital for the resolution of disputes in the construction industry. Improvements in artificial intelligence,
data analytics, and smart contracts are expected to further improve ODR platforms. Integration with such technologies
has become critical for staying competitive and remaining efficient.
Conclusion
ODR has been proved to offer benefits as an efficient, economical, and flexible ADR process in the UK’s construction
industry. Using proper legal reform, institutionalization, and cultural adjustment, ODR has immense potential to
bring about a revolution in dispute resolution in Qatar’s construction industry.
Embracing ODR, as a practice, symbolises the members of the SLQS Qatar group as people who are professional,
innovative, and strive for improved results. This article takes pride in being part of the 21st SLQS Qatar Get-Together.
References
Legislation
• Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996.
• Civil Procedure Rules 1998.
• Qatar Construction Specification 2014.
Cases
• Kajima Construction (Europe) UK Ltd v Children’s Ark Partnership Ltd [2023] EWCA Civ 292.
• Al Thani v Al-Suwaidi [2017] QATC 45.
Books and Journal Articles
• Paul H Rubin, ‘The Impact of Technology on the Cost of Dispute Resolution’ (2017) 25 Journal of Dispute
Resolution 1.
• Adrienne Foer, ‘The Rise of ODR: Implications for ADR’ (2019) 34 Arbitration International 573.
• Mohammed Al Kaabi, ‘Cultural Challenges in Arbitration in Qatar’ (2021) 9 International Journal of Arbitration
Law 155.
Reports and Institutional Publications
• Centre for Effective Dispute Resolution (CEDR), ODR (CEDR 2023).
• Effective Dispute Solutions Ltd, Construction Mediation Case Study (EDS Ltd 2022).
• Arbicon, Alternative Dispute Resolution in Construction (Arbicon 2023).
• Qatar International Court and Dispute Resolution Centre (QICDRC), Dispute Resolution Services (QICDRC
2023).
• Gulf Cooperation Council, ICT Development Report (GCC 2024).